Magazine @ HMV Picture House, 30 Aug

3/5 stars
Event review by RJ Thomson.
Published 01 September 2009

If you ever wanted to organise a middle-aged-men-who've-still-got-a-bit-of-an-edge holocaust (I don't know, David Cameron might - has anyone thought to ask him directly?) you could do far worse than organise a Magazine concert to get them all in one place. A clear reason why so many of them - one Irvine Welsh included - are here, might be to do with the fact that this is exactly what the band are too now. Which begs an interesting question: how exactly do you keep your edge?

One way, and one that Magazine prove from the outset, is in the perseverence of the questioning mentality. It is frontman Howard Devoto who takes the lead on this, coming to the mic before even the first song, and pulling out his old notebook. 'This is my old notebook,' he says, theatricalising, and playing the self-conscious artist. 'Here's something I wrote in it in 1978,' he says proudly, recalling the days of Magazine's genesis, before reading an extract that he and we both know is pretentious crap. Still ready to laugh at himself, this is in keeping with a range of knowing japes throughout the set that serve to undermine our preconceptions, give a little fun, and generally inspire a strong impression that there's no reason this needs to be a 'normal' gig, if ever such a thing as a 'normal gig' could exist in the first place.

Another way, for a band at least, is to create music that sounds edgy. This is an area where Magazine - one of the post-punk 'greats' and a band whose recorded music combines jarring roughness with transcendent multi-instrumentalism - fall short tonight. While classics like a A Song From Under the Floorboards sound grand and are rightly received rapturously, throughout the set there is a sense that the scale of sound this new tour is requiring - to fill the big venues they're now playing - has taken some of the bite from the material. Even the brutal 'I will drug you and fuck you' refrain of Permafrost, for example, has lost some of its original ironic snarl.

It is strange then, that what holds the set together and makes this gig work is the sound. While the songs may not shine as cutting contemporary messages, they sound great. When Magazine hit a groove - with Barry Adamson's bass underlining, and set guitarist Noko putting in a searing performance - they are capable of creating unembellished yet rich passages that sound entirely fresh, yet resonate meaningfully with these old lyrics of social disharmony and doubt. For all the iconoclasm, the careers that have over thirty years gone their own - mostly successful - ways, Magazine are still musicians, and play brilliantly together.

'How do you keep your edge?' is a question worth asking, not least because of the political implications of gravitating towards the centre. Even if tonight's show isn't a total triumph, Magazine still stand up as a troupe of genuine visionaries, unfussy heroes, and it's great to have them back.

Comments (5)

Add a comment »
  • They didn't play "Shot by both sides", were you there for the whole gig?

    Posted by Ritchie Thomson | Wednesday September 2009 @ 04:01

    Report to moderator
  • Ah shit! I was there for all of it - apologies for the mistake (an honest one) and thanks for the heads up. Corrected now.

    Posted by RJ Thomson | Wednesday September 2009 @ 15:40

    Report to moderator
  • This review is, quite frankly, an embarrasment. The writer clearly has absolutely no knowledge of the band, their songs, or even why the gig was put on in the first place. How can a review of a gig advertised as a 'Soap Show' make no reference to the album it is showcasing? Jesus.

    I use the term carcrash carefully, but that's exactly what this review is. In a desperate attempt to hide his ignorance, the writer makes some terrible, cliched, gag about middle aged men, and talks a lot about the rather vague concept of 'edge'.

    Please do not interpret this as some sort of pro-Magazine rant. The gig itself probably deserved 3 stars. But it certainly didn't deserve a review as hackneyed, cobbled-together and botched as this.

    Posted by DR Stevens | Wednesday September 2009 @ 16:05

    Report to moderator
  • No problem sir, it's just it was a big bone of contention for many of us fans in the pub later. In fact, by not playing their best known tune they were being "on the edge", which is what I come round to think :-) By the way we share the same initials and didn't want people to think it was me ... my friends would have strung me up ;-)

    Cheers R

    Posted by Ritchie Thomson | Wednesday September 2009 @ 16:10

    Report to moderator
  • DR Stevens, Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you (have been away).

    The truth is, I'm not the biggest expert on Magazine. But I don't think there's any attempt to 'disguise' this fact in the review: rather, it's an attempt to review the live show as experienced. There's nothing wrong with attending a live show and reporting on and reacting to what you find (not in every case, but as an occasional strategy). And it's not like I know nothing about the context of the band or gig.

    (I make this general point in contrast to, say, an album review, where the reviewer should take the time to understand the background in due detail.)

    I'm sorry you didn't like the attempts at further context, but they seemed relevant to me. I don't know that the concept of 'edge' is so vague here (it is a short piece): 'jarring roughness with transcendent multi-instrumentalism' suggests a few qualities - including surprising juxtapositions of style - that can create 'edgy' music.

    Posted by RJ Thomson | Thursday October 2009 @ 10:58

    Report to moderator
Leave a comment on this article